Do You Treasure the Friction Your Clients Have With Your Product Because of Your Ego?
A client sends you an email with a question you know you have already answered.
You remember answering it because you spent an unreasonable amount of time making sure nobody would ever need to ask. You wrote the instructions, created the welcome email, recorded the tutorial, and placed the resource inside the client portal under a heading that seems perfectly obvious to you. Somewhere between irritation and disbelief, you wonder how she missed it.
You answer politely and move on.
Two weeks later, another client asks a slightly different version of the same question. Then, during a call, someone mentioned that she was not sure what she was supposed to do after completing the first step, so she waited until your next meeting rather than risk doing the wrong thing.
By the third time, you have two choices. You can decide that your clients need to read more carefully, or you can become curious about why several intelligent, capable people are struggling at the same place.
That second choice is harder than it sounds because you built the process. You know why every piece is there, you understand how everything connects, and you may have invested considerable time and money creating it. Changing the experience means entertaining an uncomfortable possibility: the thing you designed so carefully may be creating a problem for the very people it was supposed to help.
Sometimes what we call a difficult client is simply a client who has stopped compensating for a difficult business.
There Is Friction, and Then There Is Friction
I am not interested in making every client experience effortless. Some friction is necessary because meaningful work requires participation, decisions, patience, or change. A consultant may need a client to gather information she has been avoiding, while a strategist may ask her to abandon an idea she has spent months developing because the evidence no longer supports it.
That kind of discomfort has an assignment. Removing it would weaken the result.
Unnecessary friction is different because it asks the client to expend energy without moving her meaningfully closer to what she bought. She has to search three emails to find the meeting link, enter information you already collected, watch an hour of material before she can answer a simple question, or decipher terminology that makes perfect sense inside your company and almost nowhere else.
Each inconvenience can appear too small to matter on its own. The problem is what happens when they accumulate, particularly for a client who arrived expecting expertise to make something easier, clearer, faster, or more effective.
She may have hired you precisely because she is tired of figuring everything out herself.
The Client Who Complains May Be Doing You a Favor
One of the easiest ways to defend friction is to say, “Nobody else has complained.”
That may be completely true, but silence is a poor customer-experience metric.
Consider the client who receives confusing instructions and spends twenty minutes figuring them out without contacting you. She eventually gets where she needs to go, completes the work, attends the meeting, and never says a word about the unnecessary effort. When you ask how everything is going, she tells you it is fine because the inconvenience did not feel serious enough to turn into a complaint.
From your side of the business, the process worked.
From her side, she worked around the process.
Now imagine another client reaches the same point and sends an email. She tells you that the instructions are confusing, the resource is difficult to find, or the sequence does not make sense to her. Your first instinct may be to defend what you built, particularly when dozens of people have managed to get through it before her.
Yet she may have given you information the polite clients never did.
The question is not whether someone can navigate the experience. Given enough patience, people can compensate for an astonishing amount of poor design. The better question is whether they should have to.
Your Expertise Can Make You Blind to Your Own Business
The longer you work inside a business, the more difficult it becomes to experience it like a client.
You know exactly what “Phase Two” means because you named it. You know why the onboarding questions are ordered that way because you designed them. You can locate a resource in seconds because you created the folder where it lives, and you understand the relationship between two services because you have been explaining them for five years.
Your client arrives without any of that context.
Then she does something you did not anticipate. She needs information earlier than you intended to provide it, misunderstands terminology you thought was clear, or asks whether there is a faster way to get what she needs without working through six videos first. None of those things automatically means your process is poorly designed, but when variations of the same difficulty keep appearing, her behavior becomes useful information about the experience you created.
This is where ego can become expensive.
You can continue explaining why the client should understand your system, or you can ask whether the system could understand the client better.
Your Client Did Not Buy Your Beautiful Process
Experts are understandably attached to methodology. A good methodology represents years of experience distilled into something repeatable, making delivery more consistent and helping a buyer understand that there is thought behind the work.
The danger comes when we start believing the methodology is the product.
Your client may appreciate your seven-step framework, but she probably did not wake up wanting seven steps. She wanted the problem solved. She wanted more qualified leads, clearer positioning, higher revenue, access to better opportunities, greater consistency, or the ability to forecast what was coming, instead of wondering whether she was still speaking into an abyss.
The framework is valuable to the extent that it helps her get there.
This distinction matters because businesses often increase volume to demonstrate value. The offer gets another module, another worksheet, another meeting, another portal, another dashboard, and another resource library. Eventually, the buyer receives so much “value” that using what she purchased becomes another job.
Then we become frustrated when she does not consume all of it.
Perhaps she did not buy your expertise because she wanted more information. Perhaps she bought it because she wanted to spend less time figuring out what information matters.
Sometimes Our Ego Is Hiding Inside the Word “Premium”
Friction becomes particularly easy to defend when we have attached meaning to the way something is delivered.
Perhaps the lengthy intake is part of your “high-touch” process. Maybe the extensive curriculum is what makes the program comprehensive. Perhaps clients must work through every step because that is how you have always taught the methodology, even though experienced clients repeatedly need only a fraction of it.
Once those choices become part of how we see ourselves, changing them can feel like lowering the standard.
But premium does not mean complicated.
A premium experience can be remarkably simple because someone has done the difficult thinking before the client arrives. The instructions are clear because they have been tested. The next step is obvious because someone anticipated the question. The client receives what she needs without sorting through everything the business knows.
That simplicity can require considerably more expertise than handing someone the entire library.
Friction Is Part of Your Marketing
This is where the conversation moves beyond customer service and into traditional marketing.
Marketing does not end when the payment clears. What happens after the sale influences the next sale through reputation, referrals, testimonials, retention, repeat business, and the stories clients tell when your name comes up in rooms you are not in.
A client who found your process clear and thoughtful may describe you as someone who “made everything make sense.” Another may tell a colleague that you saved her time, helped her get to the right decision quickly, or removed work she had assumed she would have to do herself. Those statements become part of your market position, whether you wrote them into your messaging or not.
The reverse is also true. You can invest heavily in attracting new clients while quietly weakening future referrals through an experience that asks existing clients to tolerate too much friction.
That is why relationship building cannot be separated from delivery. Your marketing system is not merely responsible for getting someone through the front door; it also influences what she says about the house after she leaves.
Live Events Will Tell on You Quickly
I see the same principle in traditional marketing and live events, except a room makes friction much easier to observe.
Imagine arriving at an event where the parking instructions were vague. You eventually find the entrance, only to discover a registration line because everyone has to provide information they already submitted online. Once inside, you are unsure where to sit, the schedule is difficult to locate, and the host keeps apologizing for things that could have been communicated before you arrived.
None of those problems alone destroys the event. Yet by the time the program begins, the guest has already spent attention on things that have nothing to do with why she came.
Good event curation protects that attention.
When I think about live event marketing, I am not only thinking about what happens on the stage. I am thinking about the journey into the room, how people move through it, what they need to know, where uncertainty appears, how relationships are encouraged, and what happens after everyone goes home.
The smallest points of friction can become particularly revealing because they show where the experience was designed from the organizer's point of view rather than the guest's. If people repeatedly cannot find the entrance, the solution is not to conclude that your attendees are terrible at directions. If the most valuable conversations happen during breaks, perhaps those breaks deserve more protection rather than being treated as disposable minutes between sessions.
Watch what people do with the experience you created. Their behavior may be more useful than your original plan.
“They Need to Take Responsibility” Is Sometimes True
There are moments when the client is responsible for the difficulty she is experiencing.
She may not have completed the agreed-upon work, provided the information, attended the meeting, made the decision, or followed through on something required to produce the result. A service business cannot guarantee success by removing every responsibility from the person being served.
The distinction I care about is whether the effort you are requiring contributes to the result.
A client may need to answer difficult questions about her business because those answers affect the strategy. She probably does not need to answer the same question on three different forms because your systems do not communicate with one another.
One is the work.
The other is your work being transferred to her.
When you look at friction through that lens, the question becomes much easier to answer:
Is this difficulty necessary for the result, or have I simply become accustomed to asking clients to tolerate it?
Your Systems Should Be Learning From Your Clients
A repeatable system should create consistency without becoming rigid.
That means you do not redesign your entire business every time one person has a preference. It also means you do not ignore repeated evidence because the process technically works.
This is where systems, metrics, and tracking become useful in a way that has nothing to do with vanity numbers. Keep track of the questions that appear repeatedly, the places where clients stall, the resources they cannot find, the steps they skip, the moments that require intervention, and the parts of the experience they repeatedly praise.
Over time, patterns emerge.
You may discover that a resource nobody uses can disappear. You may learn that clients need one conversation earlier in the engagement. Perhaps a 20-question intake can become twelve better questions, or the live event schedule needs more unstructured time because relationship building is producing more commercial value than another presentation would.
Those are not cosmetic improvements. They can affect capacity, retention, referrals, profitability, and how desirable the business becomes to both clients and the person running it.
Be Careful What You Defend
There is a final question underneath all of this, and it is not whether clients should get everything they request.
They should not.
The question is what happens inside you when a client struggles with something you created.
Do you become curious, or do you immediately begin building a case for why the process is correct?
That reaction can tell you whether you are protecting a standard or protecting your ego.
Standards deserve protection when they are connected to the quality of the result. Your expertise should inform what stays, what clients need to do, and where you refuse to compromise simply to make an offer easier to sell.
Ego is different. Ego says the process deserves to stay because I created it. It says clients should appreciate the resource because I spent months building it. It assumes difficulty must indicate rigor because removing a step would force me to admit the step was never necessary.
That is how friction becomes something we treasure.
Your Client Should Not Have to Overcome Your Business
There is something deeply contradictory about promising clarity, ease, access, transformation, or exceptional service and then making a client fight through the business to receive it.
She should have to participate in the work required for the result. She may need to think, decide, implement, change, practice, invest, or confront something she would rather avoid. None of that should disappear merely because good customer experience matters.
What she should not have to do is compensate for preventable confusion, unnecessary complexity, redundant processes, inaccessible information, or a business owner's attachment to a system that has stopped serving the people inside it.
The distinction is simple: your client may need to work to get the result, but she should not have to work around you to get it.
So when the next client asks the question you are certain you have already answered, answer her. Then resist the urge to immediately explain why she should have known.
Look at the question again.
Look at the experience around it.
And if the same friction keeps appearing, have enough confidence in your expertise to change what you built.
Your client did not hire you to admire your process.
She hired you because she needs to get somewhere.
Make sure your business is helping her get there.
About Sybil
Sybil Stewart is a traditional marketer, live experience expert, and the founder of Curate Rarity™. She helps established women experts build marketing systems rooted in relationships, experiences, and opportunities rather than constant content creation.
Her work challenges the idea that successful marketing requires you to be everywhere, post every day, or turn yourself into a full-time content creator. Instead, she helps experts determine what marketing needs to accomplish in their business, choose the right stages to accomplish it, and create experiences that move people toward clients, revenue, relationships, and opportunities.
Her philosophy is simple:
Marketing is mandatory. Making yourself miserable doing it isn’t.
Ways to Work With Sybil
If your business is working but your marketing isn't generating enough qualified clients, revenue, relationships, or opportunities, there are several ways to work with me.
A focused private 90-minute session for a specific marketing, positioning, offer, or live-experience decision when you need clarity and a direction you can execute.
Deeper strategic work for experts who need to diagnose what isn't working, make the right marketing decisions, and build a more reliable path between their expertise and the people who need it.
Join me for Tea & Teach™, Stagebuilders! Marketing Conference, and other intimate experiences designed for experts who want to market beyond the algorithm.
Unsure of where to start?
Digital Experiences are a great solution
Work through Sybil's thinking on your own time with practical, asynchronous resources designed to help you examine your business, make stronger marketing decisions, and put those decisions to work. Enjoy a self-guided experience for experts who want to turn existing relationships, conversations, and expertise into business without adding another exhausting marketing routine.
The First Recording Is on Me.
I speak and teach on traditional marketing, live-event marketing, experience design, and creating more thoughtful, accessible experiences.
**Explore ways to work with me at **sybilstewart.com.
Comments